F1-2 Aphid 2009/05/15 (Fri) 10:19 No. 28646 <after the break>
In unison they spoke, as if the voice increased in loudness. You see, I could discern the one from the other, yet I could not. As beyond the words I could not discern any kind of realistic diffrence between the voices beyond that there was voice one, and voice two. There was no emotion to be found, no age to be discerned of the speaker. The experience was quite otherworldly. But let us put ourselves beyond these pathetic little words of mine, and see what 'they' had to tell me. Since I didn't have the vaguest of a clue how to do anything but 'listen' if you could call it that. It was thus that was conveyed upon me that "thou beyest wise to have come to this opportunity. But a philosopher I designate you, when you would find that which is beyond your current grasp.". Thus my attention was suddenly portrayed upon the voices. Now they started speaking in turn, as they had done before this sudden outburst for I do not remember how long it would have been measured in seconds, minutes, hours, years, centuries? Scale is such an incomprehensible thing. Anyway, of course this was due mostly because time seemed not to exist here, or perhaps it did exist. And, like time likes to do and is as well bound to do, moved. But at what speed? Who knows. For now I will just label the voices for your convenience. Let us say that voice number one, or just number 1, 'spoke' and stated to us the following: "Discerning your correct course of action, perhaps you should view things. You see, how it was seen by men and women.". A second voice took over, to the extent that "not only that. Viewing? I think that is not nearly complete. You see, you might get the... wrong ideas like that. By all means, you should predict.". "Well yes, reason is the basis of success in the world. Reason, as long as the base of knowledge remains sound, is a dilligent way to work towards a solution.". "That is Quite so, please have your own way as always, and continue." the second voice replied in a not-so-but-still lengthy fasion. "It's not always as easy though. Sometimes reasoning, figuring something out can be an arduous process, even when having all the pieces together." "Our little gamble of reason, our little game of reason would be a little stale without a little reward, no?" the second voice replied. A game? But this does not seem anything like it, doesn't it? As if an answer would be given to my thoughts, the other voice belched out a monstrosity of a sentence. Or was it three sentences? "As for when the bounds of our newfound knowledge through viewing suddenly overlap the bounds we set for ourselves to be true through reason, through guessing, or through something described as fate, my, oh yes would we recieve our rewards. But really, when one sets a bound of reason to get a reward, who is to say it could not be as I just proposed a guess? Just making a significant amount of guesses... one could gain, thus for the guess to have power would be a rediculous proposal." Once again the second voice replied. "For the guess to have power to be rediculous. Yes, I can see this. I fathom you wish to restrain and border our freedom, our life of possibilities?". Quite surprisingly came a very, very short response from the original, the first voice. It consisted of merely a submissal, a short "yes", so to speak. Not that there was any actual speech involved, mind you. But the second voice, she replied to this. Apparently this, whatever it was, did not agree with an idea supposedly originating from it. "It is very much true, that a mere guess having power is intolerable. But in a lesser amount, I can still not accept it. They are still guesses. Might, existing without risk in a game as well-endowed as this? I refuse to participate in such trivialities. ". A curt reply was just an intermission; "Then, thy who considers thine as being in the disposition to decide, how would thy decide?", followed up by a continued rebuttal, something along the lines of this: "An actually satisfying solution? Why do we not consider punishment? For yes, why not say that those that turn out to contradict, put the responsible party, you, in triple jeopardy? That only seems fair, does it not?". The other 'voice' caught on to this idea quickly, apparently. With no emotions to tell me anything, I had little to go by after all. "We could then also say that perhaps that which has already been uttered and is uttered again is unworthy. Well, to the first degree, that is. And then of course, your responsibility, your record could be tracked as a named one by your code. Your efforts. I am sure that this could very well work quite favorably when we return to this very vantage point. I have just one more thing to say to you. Say I must, to you, that this very significant thing is just significance itself. The significance of it will equal the weight of whatever fate you predict. Why sometimes you might 'percieve' this significance all by yourself, you see. Such a significance, it has a measurement attached. A measurement, done alongside a certain scale. That scale, well let me just say to you, here, that it would be literally equal whether integral or not."
The second voice, however, was not so content to leave you behind. Another reply came. "That seemed such a simple ploy. Now you'll surely understand what's with those {} too fast. Well, notwithstanding that actually important and noteworthy matter, a veritable mistake of my associate it was to not supply you with quite the piece of information needed. You see, this reward we spoke of, or this punishment, whichever it will be, renders power to the thing predicted. The reason could very well be because this power is and comes to being because appliance comes when truth is revealed. When the latter does not come to pass, the former will most likely neither. This is all, and understanding should be present or coming for different parts of our dialogue. A farewell and bad luck.
In your mind, you imagine a loud "popping" noise as the voice vanishes from your thoughts. Interestingly, you remember the words. Even who said what. Not that this particular fact is going to be of any help. I wonder, what will come next? How can someone actually speak accolades, even in that weird state? Made me imagine them? But for what purpose? When I open a view through the perspective of this whole thing happening to me, what will I see? An awful lot of questions through my mind.
<The first voice, wait a minute, I think it is (...)> {10}
<That second voice. That can only be (...)> {9}
<The purpose for which the accolades were made, eh?>{4}
<Don't bore me with these weird contraptions. This is a dream, a facade!>{5}
<My freedom? This is going to be restrained anyhow>{1}
<(.....)>{?}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{OOC} Because this wasn't told you, (.) means a couple of letters. (...) is of course a word, or perhaps a name. (.....), I'd guess that's something longer no?